Health and climate benefits of different energy-efficiency and renewable energy choices
Author: ["Jonathan J. Buonocore","Patrick Luckow","Gregory Norris","John D. Spengler","Bruce Biewald","Jeremy Fisher","Jonathan I. Levy"]
Publication: Nature Climate Change
CITE.CC academic search helps you expand the influence of your papers.
Abstract
Energy efficiency (EE) and renewable energy (RE) can benefit public health and the climate by displacing emissions from fossil-fuelled electrical generating units (EGUs). Benefits can vary substantially by EE/RE installation type and location, due to differing electricity generation or savings by location, characteristics of the electrical grid and displaced power plants, along with population patterns. However, previous studies have not formally examined how these dimensions individually and jointly contribute to variability in benefits across locations or EE/RE types. Here, we develop and demonstrate a high-resolution model to simulate and compare the monetized public health and climate benefits of four different illustrative EE/RE installation types in six different locations within the Mid-Atlantic and Lower Great Lakes of the United States. Annual benefits using central estimates for all pathways ranged from US$5.7–US$210 million (US$14–US$170 MWh−1), emphasizing the importance of site-specific information in accurately estimating public health and climate benefits of EE/RE efforts. Clean energy can provide different health and environmental benefits depending on location. Modelling shows that renewable energy and energy-saving projects could deliver annual benefits of up to US$210 million across six locations in the USA.
Cite this article
Buonocore, J., Luckow, P., Norris, G. et al. Health and climate benefits of different energy-efficiency and renewable energy choices. Nature Clim Change 6, 100–105 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2771
